The Boundaries of Prohibited AI – Designing an 'Ethics-First' Biometric Policy
The EU AI Act introduces the principle of “Unacceptable Risk”, categorically prohibiting AI systems that manipulate human behavior or endanger fundamental rights (such as social scoring or, in most cases, real-time biometric identification in public space). For companies developing AI (e.g., hiring tools, monitoring systems), the most critical task is legal prevention: they must prove that their system does not cross the fine line that leads into the Red Zone (Prohibited).
LDT and Legal Tech are essential here for transforming abstract legal prohibitions into concrete, operational barriers against unethical application.
The line between permitted and criminal behavior.
The risk is twofold and extremely high:
- Legal Risk: Violating prohibited practices leads to the highest penalties (up to 7% of global turnover) and potentially criminal liability.
- Reputational Risk: Discovering that an AI system discriminates or violates user privacy destroys investor trust (e.g., New York) and regulatory trust (e.g., Geneva).
The problem is that AI engineers do not read legal regulations. LDT must visually convey the legal boundary to the people actually coding the system.
LDT: Designing an Ethics-First Control Dashboard
LDT is used to create tools that function as the first line of ethical defense for engineering and product teams.
- Visual Forbidden Zone Flowchart:
A mandatory visual decision-flow diagram is created that the team must complete before development begins. Questions are shown graphically and logically lead to a clear outcome:
Does the AI system categorize people by race/religion? (YES) STOP (Unacceptable Risk).
The goal: Visually embed legal prohibitions into the engineering workflow, eliminating ignorance as an excuse.
Bias Testing & Mitigation Dashboard:
LDT designs a control dashboard that visually displays bias-test results with metrics and charts (e.g., whether hiring decisions produced by the algorithm disproportionately disadvantage a protected demographic group).
Regulators are provided visual proof of active bias mitigation, which is critical to defending against discrimination lawsuits.
Biometric Compliance Protocol (Visuals):
For AI systems using biometric data in permitted scenarios (e.g., authentication), LDT is used to design a visual protocol for de-identification. It visually shows how and when biometric data is deleted or anonymized, ensuring compliance with both GDPR and the AI Act.
LDT is critical because it allows global companies to actively protect human rights and avoid the regulatory traps of the EU AI Act.
By designing an Ethics-First control system, you ensure AI is reliable, ethical, and—most importantly—legally safe for global deployment.
Does your AI team fully understand the legal cost of crossing the “Unacceptable Risk” boundary?
Other blogs
The Era of Deepfake - Designing a Legal Protocol for Authenticating Corporate Communications
The advent of generative AI has enabled the mass production of Deepfake (AI-generated) audio…
Ownership in the Age of Autonomous AI – How to Design a Visual Attribution Protocol for Agents
Generative artificial intelligence has brought the first wave of disruption to the Intellectual…